Just a quick note that it's coming soon, so keep checking back on Sumea so that you don't miss out.. in case you missed the news post a while ago..
http://www.sumea.com.au/snews.asp?news=490
Prize for Sumea's 3rd 3D challenge: PS2 version of Grand Prix Challenge.. The very kind people at Infogrames have decided to donate a copy of Grand Prix Challenge (PS2) to be given to the winner of the 3rd Sumea 3D challenge - due to start around mid April.
(well, real soon now anyway!!!) [:)]
quote:Originally posted by Malus
Just a quick thing, I think the topic of the challenge should be defined by the winner of the previous one, a reward in itself.
I'm not so sure I agree. It's a good idea in theory, but what's to stop a winner starting a model early before announcing what the challenge will be? I'm not saying that anyone would do that - but for a free PS2 game, who's to say?
If possible, I'd go for the sponsor of the prize suggesting the idea. However, Dan's suggestion of never being able to name the topic twice in a row isn't a bad idea.
Nice and trusting of your fellow man there John.
I just noticed most forums that do challenges do what I suggested and they have no worries.
I can only speak for myself but the prize isn't why I do this, if someone cheats then so be it, I could care less, they're the losers in the end.
And if someone wins all the time they still deserve the reward don't they, the rest of us would just have to do better, good motivation in my eyes.
quote:Originally posted by Malus
Nice and trusting of your fellow man there John.
Read this bit from my previous post because it's a little mind-boggling at first:
quote:I'm not saying that anyone would do that
Just call me "Reality-Man". But how many times have people wished they had 'more time'? A days work can make the difference between a good model and a fantastic one.
But as I said, I thought Mochumbo's idea of not being able to name the challenge twice in a row is a good idea. Im not totally opposed to the winner naming the next challenge, but it does upset the neutrality of the contest.
Just a quick thing, I think the topic of the challenge should be defined by the winner of the previous one, a reward in itself.